Settled, neither admitted nor denied CA NYSE

Nortel Networks: Cookie-Jar Reserve Manipulation for Executive Bonuses

Manufactured redundant accruals in profitable periods, then bled $900M into earnings to trigger return-to-profitability bonuses.

CASE PROFILE & BENCHMARKS

Target Issuer: Nortel Networks Corporation (CA).
Fraud Period: January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2006.
Reported Overstatement: $3.2B.
Total Fines & Penalties: $35.0M.
Maximum Incarceration: No prison sentence.
Independent Auditor: Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Primary Schemes: cookie jar reserves.
Enforcement Status: SETTLED (neither admit nor deny).

OVERSTATEMENT $3.2B USD reported

TOTAL PENALTIES $35.0M Civil & disgorgement

PRISON TIME None No prison sentence

FIRST ACTION September 20, 2006 Initial proceeding

DETECTION METHOD Regulatory Enforcement & Forensic Audit Discovery source

PRIMARY REGULATOR Ontario Securities Commission CA

ACCOUNTING MECHANICS FOR THIS CASE

HOW IT WAS DONE

Without admitting or denying the findings, the respondents consented to orders establishing that The company manipulated its accounting records by executing schemes under cookie-jar-reserves. Financial reports filed with market regulators contained material misstatements that distorted true financial condition.

Applicable Scheme Classifications:

cookie jar reserves →

CHARGED RESPONDENTS & OUTCOMES

1 NAMED PARTIES

Respondent	Role	Disposition & Judicial Outcome	Prison	Civil Penalty	O&D Bar
Nortel Networks Corporation	ISSUER	Enforcement order and financial sanctions imposed.	None	$35.0M	No

RED FLAGS OBSERVED PRIOR TO DISCOVERY

EARLY SIGNALS

CASH FLOW TO NET INCOME DIVERGENCE 2004 Operating cash flow severely diverged from reported earnings

ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS & PRIMARY DOCKETS

PRIMARY SOURCE CITATIONS

foreign regulator ENF-2004-nortel-networks

Filing Date: September 20, 2006

Enforcement Action: Nortel Networks: Cookie-Jar Reserve Manipulation for Executive Bonuses

Manufactured redundant accruals in profitable periods, then bled $900M into earnings to trigger return-to-profitability bonuses.

Provisions: Securities & Corporate Law Compliance

Disposition: neither admit nor deny View Primary Record ↗

TIMELINE OF EVENTS

CHRONOLOGY

June 1, 2004 • Misstatement

Material accounting irregularities commenced.

September 20, 2006 • Enforcement

Regulators commenced formal proceedings.

FINANCIAL CRIME REFERENCE SERIES

Cross-Domain Investigation Network

Major corporate accounting scandals frequently intersect with parallel financial crime domains. For violations outside financial reporting scope, explore the companion reference libraries in our open research series:

How Scams Work ↗

Consumer fraud, advance fee fraud, romance scams, phishing, social engineering, impersonation

How Money Laundering Works ↗

Placement, layering, integration, trade-based money laundering, smurfing, shell companies, bank secrecy

How Sanctions Evasion Works ↗

OFAC enforcement, dark fleet shipping, transshipment hubs, export control violations, circumvention networks

How Market Manipulation Works ↗

Spoofing, pump and dump schemes, wash trading, front running, insider trading, benchmark fixing

How Tax Evasion Works ↗

Offshore tax havens, transfer pricing abuse, carousel fraud, undeclared foreign accounts, aggressive tax shelters